davidcameron.com
- Gerar link
- X
- Outros aplicativos
Scotland referendum: Voters say No to independence from U.K.
561 shares
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
Related Stories
External Links
(Note: CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of external links.)
UPDATED
- 55.3 per cent vote No, to 44.7 per cent Yes
- British PM appoints official to oversee Scotland negotiations
- Yes Scotland's Salmond calls vote 'triumph for democratic process'
Voters in Scotland have sent a clear signal to continue as part of the United Kingdom in a historic referendum vote, although there promises to be a substantial change in the 307-year union in the coming months.
1 of 19
Just over two million people, or 55.3 per cent of registered voters, said No to independence, with over 1.6 million, or 44.7 per cent, in the Yes camp.
British Prime Minister David Cameron, speaking outside 10 Downing, expressed satisfaction at the result just after 7 a.m. local time on Friday and said it was time for the United Kingdom to move forward.
"There can be no disputes, no reruns. We have heard the settled will of the Scottish people," Cameron said.
"I also want to pay tribute to Yes Scotland for a well-fought campaign and to say to all those who did vote for independence — we hear you," he added.
- LIVE BLOG: Latest photos, tweets, videos on the Scottish referendum
- British pound rises after Scotland voters reject independence
- Canada welcomes referendum results
- GALLERY: Scotland votes No in historic referendum
Cameron promised to honour commitments made in the final days of the campaign to Scotland, as well as explore how Great Britain can work best for the people of England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The British pound hit a two-year high against the euro and a two-week high against the U.S. dollar as markets shrugged off recent anxiety Friday about a possible vote for independence. In early Asian trading, the pound jumped nearly 0.8 per cent to $1.6525 against the U.S. dollar before falling back slightly. Britain's main stock index opened higher.
Alex Salmond, the first minister who led the independence campaign, spoke earlier in the day to concede the result in the referendum. He spoke with three of 32 regional centres left to report. British media outlets had forecast a victory for the No side after 26 results were official.
"Scotland has by majority decided not, at this stage, to become an independent country. I accept that verdict of the people and I call on all of Scotland to follow suit in accepting the democratic verdict of the people of Scotland," Salmond said.
He praised the Yes campaign, which at that point had counted roughly 1.5 million votes, as a "substantial vote for Scottish independence."
VOTE DETAILS
The question on the ballot asked voters simply: "Should Scotland be an independent country?" and droves of voters turned out for their chance to weigh in on Scotland's future.
There were more than 4.2 million registered voters, which represents roughly 97 per cent of all eligible voters. Scotland residents as young as 16 were among the voters.
With all 32 centres reporting, there were 2,001,926 votes parked for No, to 1,617,989 for Yes. Turnout was pegged at 84.6 per cent.
It was the rarest of referendums, coming in peacetime and with a relative lack of rancour between the two sides.
"This has been a triumph for the democratic process and for participation in politics," said Salmond.
Many saw it as a "heads versus hearts" campaign, with cautious older Scots concluding that independence would be too risky financially, while younger ones were enamoured with the idea of building their own country.
The Yes campaign was looking for a greater determination with oil and natural gas reserves in the North Sea, health care, and spending and taxation, among other issues.
Canada welcomed the result of the Scottish vote.
"Canada and the United Kingdom share deep historical bonds and an important working partnership," Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird said in a statement Friday. "We look forward to this friendship continuing well into the future."
'DEVOLUTION' TALKS TO BEGIN IN EARNEST
Saying she was "personally bitterly disappointed" with the results, Deputy Scottish National Party Leader Nicola Sturgeon told BBC that Scottish nationalists "need to pick ourselves up and move on."
Cameron made an impassioned case for a No vote days earlier, warning that a vote for independence would be "forever" and urging voters to choose to stick together.
As well, Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Bank were among the corporations threatening to move their Scotland operations to England in the event of a Yes vote.
In the waning days of the campaign, the leaders of the three major British parties made a splashy promise on the front page of Scotland's Daily Record to give enhanced powers to the country, likely entailing a series of negotiations into the foreseeable future.
"Scotland will expect these to be honoured in rapid course," Salmond said in his concession, to a rapturous response.
Cameron announced that Robert Smith, chairman of the recent Commonwealth Games in Glasgow, would head the so-called devolution talks process regarding taxation, spending and welfare.
Cameron said the target date for draft legislation on those affairs would be January.
JUST 4 CENTRES IN YES COLUMN
Scotland has a population of just over five million, a small proportion of the more than 64 million in the broader U.K.
Scotland is currently allotted 59 seats out of 650 in British Parliament.
Chief vote counting officer Mary Pitcaithly said with just one centre left struggling to get its count reported, "it is clear the majority have voted 'No' to the referendum question."
Clackmannanshire, the first region to report on the night, was a win for the No vote, with 54 per cent rejecting an independent Scotland.
The first six centres to report all went into the No column, with Dundee and West Dunbartonshire then becoming the first tallying for the Yes side.
The margin between the two sides for all of Scotland after eight centres reported in was just 1,400 votes — until Midlothian reported a comfortable result for the No campaign. Stirling and Dumfries followed, even more clearcut for No.
Those pining for a break from the United Kingdom would see just two more fall into the Yes column, including the country's largest city. Glasgow's vote count came in at just over 364,000, with 53.5 per cent choosing Yes.
The capital of Edinburgh went the other way, with a No victory by over 70,000 votes.
GORDON BROWN WINS
The fifth centre to report was the closest of all 32. The margin of victory among 54,572 total voters in Inverclyde was just 86, with the No side on top and consistent with the overall mood of the electorate in this referendum.
Among the most prominent winners in Thursday's vote was former British prime minister Gordon Brown.
A Scot, he went full-tilt into the No campaign in the last days before the vote. Unimpeded by the kind of unpopularity that made David Cameron a hard sell in Scotland, he argued that Scots could be devoted to Scotland but still proud of their place in the U.K.
"There is not a cemetery in Europe that does not have Scots, English, Welsh and Irish lined side by side," Brown said before the vote. "We not only won these wars together, we built the peace together. What we have built together by sacrificing and sharing, let no narrow nationalism split asunder."
font images google
font redaction cbc.ca/news/world/scotland-referendum-voters-say-no-to-independence-from-u-k-1.2771174
Queen Elizabeth’s Household Funds Down To £1 Million, Royal Palaces In Disrepair
- inShare12
A report by the Commons public accounts committee found that the Queen’s advisers were failing to control her finances while the royal palaces were “crumbling”.
MPs said her advisers had overspent to such an extent that her reserve fund had fallen from £35 million in 2001 to just £1 million today.
The Royal household had made efficiency savings of just 5 per cent over the past five years compared with government departments, that are cutting their budgets by up to a third.
MPs on the committee said the Treasury must “get a grip” and help to protect the royal palaces from “further damage and deterioration”.
Margaret Hodge, the Labour chairman of the committee, said: “We believe that the Treasury has a duty to be actively involved in reviewing the household’s financial planning and management — and it has failed to do so.”
Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle are reported to be in urgent need of repair. Staff must catch rain in buckets to protect art and antiquities, while the Queen’s old boilers were contributing to bills of £774,000 a year.
Mrs Hodge said: “The household must get a much firmer grip on how it plans to address its maintenance backlog. It has not even costed the repair works needed to bring the estate back to an acceptable condition. Again, the Treasury has an oversight role here.”
In April 2012 the Sovereign Grant replaced the old way of funding the Royal family through the Civil List and various Government grants.
The Sovereign Grant represents 15 per cent of the net surplus income of the Crown Estate, land holdings that generate money for the Treasury.
A Buckingham Palace spokesman said the sovereign grant had made the Queen’s funding “more transparent and scrutinized” and was resulting in a “more efficient use of public funds”.
He said that repairing the royal palaces was a “significant financial priority”, and that the Royal household had almost doubled its income to £11.6 million since 2007.
The spokesman said: “The move to the Sovereign Grant has created a more transparent and scrutinised system, which enables the Royal household to allocate funding according to priorities. This has resulted in a more efficient use of public funds.”
A Treasury spokesman said: “The new arrangements established by the Sovereign Grant Act have made the royal finances more transparent than ever while providing the long term stability necessary for good planning.”
Read more
This post originally appeared at The Telegraph. Copyright 2014. Follow The Telegraph on Twitter.
font images google
font redaction http://www.businessinsider.com/queen-elizabeths-funds-down-to-1-million-pounds-while-royal-palaces-in-disrepair-2014-1#ixzz2rmEHTZ8E
font images google
font redaction http://www.businessinsider.com/queen-elizabeths-funds-down-to-1-million-pounds-while-royal-palaces-in-disrepair-2014-1#ixzz2rmEHTZ8E
22 January 2014 Last updated at 12:56 GMT
Continue reading the main story
Latest news:
Economy tracker: Unemployment
The number of people out of work fell by 167,000 to 2.32 million in the three months to November, according to the Office for National Statistics.
The unemployment rate of the economically active population fell to 7.1%, near to the point at which the Bank of England has said it will consider raising interest rates.
The number of people in work is 30.15 million.
The claimant count - the number of people claiming Jobseeker's Allowance - fell by 24,000 to 1.25 million in November.
Understanding unemployment:- A person is classed as unemployed if not only out of work, but also actively looking for work and available to start work within a fortnight
- Unemployment figures are based on a survey carried out by the Office for National Statistics. They show the average number of people unemployed over a three-month period
- A new survey is done every month, but comparisons are made between separate three-month periods, not overlapping ones. e.g. April-June v Jan-March, not April-June v March-May
- The ONS also publishes the claimant count which shows the number of people receiving Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) in a particular month. That figure comes from information supplied by the Department for Work and Pensions
- The unemployment figure is higher than the claimant count as many jobseekers do not or cannot claim JSA
- The two main measures can sometimes move in different directions. A change in benefits rules moving people on to JSA from another benefit, for example, would increase the claimant count without a corresponding increase in unemployment.
Continue reading the main story
GET HELP
- How to get a job in... guides
- How to write a successful CV
- Jamal Edwards' tips for entrepreneurs
- How to start a business
Unemployment is referred to as a lagging indicator, because businesses will often delay laying people off as long as they can in difficult times.
A few months after the start of the recession in 2008, unemployment started to rise sharply. When the global financial crisis hit, the unemployment rate was a little over 5% or 1.6 million.
Towards the end of 2009, with the UK coming out of its severest recession since the 1950s, it was almost a million higher at 2.5 million, or 8%.
Unemployment peaked at almost 2.7 million at the end of 2011, its highest level for 17 years.
UK Economy
Unemployment
Forward Guidance
How the Bank's policy affects you
The Bank of England will not consider raising interest rates until the unemployment rate has fallen to below 7%, so how might that affect you?
Flanders: The Bank's new guidance
Rates linked to jobless target
Related Stories
- 18 APRIL 2012
- Gerar link
- X
- Outros aplicativos
Comentários
Postar um comentário