https://itunes.apple.com/br/app/...new-york-times/id284862083?..

Hate won. The hatred of the different, the intransigence with plurality. They have overcome torture, misogyny, homophobia, racism

"THE PRESS CHOSE BOLSONARO TO BE CONNIVING WITH THE HATE"

The press elected Bolsonaro to be conniving with hatred

Hate won. The hatred of the different, the intransigence with plurality. They conquered torture, misogyny, homophobia, racism. It has overcome authoritarianism, the setback of those who want to take the country back to the point where it was "40 or 50 years ago."

Jair Bolsonaro did not defeat Brazil's civilizational project alone. To overthrow everything that has been built since 1985, since the redemocratization, many forces have joined.

The security forces, which democracy has never been able to tame, have united.

The ultraconservative churches that do not tolerate each other are united.

They united the owners of the wealth of the country, which always showed hatred for democracy.

But it is necessary at this moment to name the oxen and to say that a gigantic part of the fault for this retrocession rests with the barons of the Brazilian press. And here it is possible to differentiate between independent vehicles and baronial vehicles. And it is possible to differentiate between the shop floor and the owners.

While the young vehicles made every effort to do journalism (Nexo, Poder 360, Livre.Jor), the newspapers sank in collusion with a criminal application.

Never in a decent country, with a press worthy of the name, things could have happened like they did in Brazil.

A candidate can not defend censorship of the press, torture, dictatorship and pass unharmed as this mere captain of the reserve has passed.

It is not possible to tolerate the intolerable.

In any civilized place, the speech in which the candidate, a week after the election, promises to send to Ponta da Praia, a center of torture and extermination, his political enemies, would have led to the harshest headlines, the most incisive editorials.

Here, it was said that the candidate moderated the speech.

Newspaper editorials were ashamed. The same newspapers that were tigers before Dilma Rousseff turned out to be Tchutchucas faced with a torturant captain.

Violent assaults were made on petism, and it was felt that there was a saint on the other side. The saint, gentlemen, is a barbarian who advocates placing rats in the vaginas of prisoners, who call themselves sons to see the torture of naked parents.

The man who promised to close the Congress on the first day of power came to the presidency. 
Only the union of democratic forces will save us. But for that, do not count on the newspapers. They have already shown which side they are on.

google images source

Download