Obama Says He Will Pursue Diplomacy on Iran and Syria
google-com-uk/
FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
ROBERTO-MARINE FOUNDATION
City Hall Victory
Government of the State of Espirito Santo
Jose Roberto Marinho
GLORIOUS VIEW MAGAZINE -
GLOBE NETWORK TELEVISION
zero hour
RBS Group (South Brazil Network Television)
RBS
Mail the People (rs)
The sun
People Gazette
MUNICIPALITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO
Government of the state of sao paulo
City Hall of St. Paul
Government of the state of Rio de Janeiro
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live
www.hollywoodnews.com
www.nytimes.com
www.washingtonpost.com
www.foxnews.com
BBC News -
UK Uol.com Msn.com
gazetaonline.globo.com
Globo> RPC TV
Rio de Janeiro
Government of the state of Rio de Janeiro
Government of the state of holy spirit
Government of the state of Minas Gerais
City Hall of Belo Horizonte
City Hall of rio de janeiro
Government of the state of Rio de Janeiro
Politics
Obama Says He Will Pursue Diplomacy on Iran and Syria
Stephen Crowley/The New York Times
Obama's U.N. Speech in 3 Minutes: Addressing the United Nations General Assembly, President Obama explained his positions on Syria and Iran, and the peace process between Israelis and Palestinians.
By MARK LANDLER
Published: September 24, 2013 206 Comments
UNITED NATIONS — President Obama said on Tuesday that Iran’s diplomatic overture in recent weeks could provide a foundation for an agreement on its nuclear program, but he warned that “conciliatory words will have to be matched by actions that are transparent and verifiable.”
Multimedia
Related
Israel Continues to Sound Alarm on Iranian Overture (September 25, 2013)
The Lede: Israeli Diplomats Mock Iran’s President Online(September 24, 2013)
Readers’ Comments
Share your thoughts.
Speaking to the United Nations General Assembly, Mr. Obama sounded a cautiously optimistic tone about the prospects for diplomacy, saying he had instructed Secretary of State John Kerry to pursue face-to-face negotiations with Iran on its nuclear program.
“The roadblocks may prove to be too great,” he said, “but I firmly believe the diplomatic path must be tested.”
Mr. Obama also called on the Security Council to pass a “strong” resolution that would impose consequences on Syria if it failed to turn over its chemical weapons. The American threat of military action against Syria, Mr. Obama said, set in motion diplomatic efforts with Russia to take over and eventually destroy Mr. Assad’s weapons.
“Without a credible military threat, the Security Council had demonstrated no inclination to act at all,” the president said. “If we cannot agree even on this, then it will show that the U.N. is incapable of enforcing the most basic of international laws. On the other hand, if we succeed, it will send a powerful message that the use of chemical weapons has no place in the 21st century, and that this body means what it says.”
A much-anticipated handshake between Mr. Obama and President Hassan Rouhani of Iran on the sidelines of the meeting did not materialize, a senior American official said, apparently because the Iranians concluded it would be too complicated politically for their president.
Mr. Obama also announced that the United States would pledge an additional $340 million in humanitarian aid to help refugees from the civil war in Syria. And while he praised the diplomatic initiative by Russia on chemical weapons, he also said that the continuing support of Russia and Iran for the government of President Bashar al-Assad risked leading to further extremism in Syria.
Mr. Obama’s speech came at a time of swift, almost disorienting diplomatic developments, with the White House first threatening a military strike against Syria, then backing off, and then suddenly encountering a diplomatic opening with Iran on its nuclear program. Mr. Obama tried to take account of all of it, in a wide-ranging speech that echoed some of the themes of his address last spring on the changing American role in the world.
“For the United States,” he said, “these new circumstances have also meant shifting away from a perpetual war-footing.”
Part of the American recalculation, he said, involves restricting the use of drones in counterterrorism operations; transferring prisoners from the military prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba and ultimately shutting it down; and rethinking broad surveillance activities.
“Just as we reviewed how we deploy our extraordinary military capabilities in a way that lives up to our ideals,” the president said, “we have begun to review the way that we gather intelligence, so as to properly balance the legitimate security concerns of our citizens and allies with the privacy concerns that all people share.”
Mr. Obama emphasized three areas: the civil war and the use of chemical weapons in Syria, the prospect of diplomacy with Iran, and the Middle East peace process between Israelis and Palestinians, which has recently restarted under the prodding of Mr. Kerry.
“The time is now ripe for the entire international community to get behind the pursuit of peace,” he said. “Already, Israeli and Palestinian leaders have demonstrated a willingness to take significant political risks.”
But much of Mr. Obama’s focus was on when the United States would use its power in the Middle East. Acknowledging that his reversal on Syria had prompted uneasiness in the region about American resolve, Mr. Obama insisted that the United States would still act to protect its interests and, in some cases, to avert humanitarian tragedies.
“The United States of America is prepared to use all elements of our power, including military force, to secure these core interests in the region,” he said. “We will confront external aggression against our allies and partners, as we did in the Gulf War.”
Speaking immediately after Mr. Obama, Turkey’s president, Abdullah Gul, welcomed the Russian-American agreement to rid Syria of its chemical weapons stockpile. But Mr. Gul, whose government has emerged as one of Mr. Assad’s biggest opponents, also said that the Syrian conflict had become a “real threat to regional peace and security” and that the United Nations had a responsibility to help resolve the crisis, which has left more than 100,000 people dead and millions displaced.
On Iran, Mr. Obama mixed hope with wariness, saying that three decades of estrangement would not be repaired quickly.
“I don’t believe this difficult history can be overcome overnight – the suspicion runs too deep,” Mr. Obama declared. “But I do believe that if we can resolve the issue of Iran’s nuclear program, that can serve as a major step down a long road toward a different relationship – one based on mutual interests and mutual respect.”
A senior State Department official, commenting on Mr. Obama’s remarks, emphasized the difficulties still looming over any negotiation with Iran. “The president has asked Secretary Kerry to help play a leading role as we determine the path forward,” the official said. “But actions speak louder than words, and the steps taken by the Iranians in the weeks ahead to show they are serious will determine how successful these efforts will be and how long they will take.”
President François Hollande of France, a strong American ally in dealing with both Syria and Iran, echoed some of Mr. Obama’s assertions in his General Assembly speech, saying he expected Iran to provide “concrete gestures which will show that this country renounces its military nuclear program even if it clearly has the right to pursue its civilian program.” Mr. Hollande was expected to meet with Iran’s new president later in the day.
The first speech of the day was from Brazil’s president, Dilma Rousseff, who delivered a denunciation of the United States over reports that the National Security Agency monitored e-mails, text messages and other electronic communications between Ms. Rousseff and her aides. Last week, Ms. Rousseff canceled a state visit to Washington to signal her displeasure with the N.S.A. surveillance.
Mr. Obama, who spoke after Ms. Rousseff, also sent a warning to Egypt’s military-backed government that it would lose American support if it continued to crack down on dissident elements there.
“We will continue support in areas like education that benefit the Egyptian people,” he said. “But we have not proceeded with the delivery of certain military systems, and our support will depend upon Egypt’s progress in pursuing a democratic path.”
In Egypt, the state media saw only good news in Mr. Obama’s speech despite his criticism. On the Web site of Al Ahram, the flagship state newspaper, a headline declared: “Obama: the current Egyptian government took steps towards democracy.” The article reported that Mr. Obama had credited the government with "consistent steps towards democracy" and continued military aid "depends on the route Egypt takes on the democratic path".
As Mr. Obama spoke, the United Nations was crackling with speculation that he might shake hands with President Rouhani of Iran, who was scheduled to address the General Assembly later on Tuesday. But there was no sign of President Rouhani at a lunch for all the visiting heads of state given by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, where a possible encounter and handshaking opportunity would have presented itself.
Mr. Rouhani also was not in the General Assembly hall for Mr. Obama’s speech, though Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, was.
The last time an American president met an Iranian leader was on Dec. 31, 1977, when Jimmy Carter and his wife, Rosalynn, spent New Year’s Eve as a guest of the shah of Iran. As he made a toast to the shah at a state dinner, Mr. Carter said the idea for the trip had come from Mrs. Carter, when he asked her with whom she would like to celebrate the holiday.
“We have no other nation on Earth who is closer to us in planning for our mutual military security,” Mr. Carter said. “We have no other nation with whom we have closer consultation on regional problems that concern us both. And there is no leader with whom I have a deeper sense of personal gratitude and personal friendship.”
Less than two years later, an angry crowd overran the American embassy in Tehran, holding 52 Americans hostage for 444 days and plunging relations between Iran and the United States into a deep freeze from which they have not yet emerged.
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: September 24, 2013
An earlier version of this article misspelled the name of former President Jimmy Carter’s wife. She is Rosalynn Carter, not Rosalyn.
 |
206 Comments
In his speech to the UN General Assembly, President Obama said he was determined to test Iranian President Hassan Rouhani's recent diplomatic gestures and challenged him to take concrete steps toward resolving Iran's long-running nuclear dispute with the West.
But in a sign of the difficulties the two nations face in trying to seize a historic opening after decades of hostility, US and Iranian officials were unable to orchestrate a much-anticipated encounter between the leaders on the sidelines.
Even a brief meeting or simple handshake would have been symbolically important given that it would be the first face-to-face contact between US and Iranian heads of government since before the 1979 Islamic revolution that ousted the shah.
Still, baby steps are better than no steps.
North korea provides iran with the latest tecknowledgy(ie: nuclear war head?)
and iran ships them oil
North korea has a "mineaturized warhead " with a 7 megaton yield
IF Iran were to mount this warhead (in the guize of being a comunications or weather satelite ,as the announced last year ) on the same missle that launched a chimp into space last year , and manuvered it into the same polar orbit as N korea's supposedly "failed" weather satelite , They could bring all the conunications satelite in the northern hemisphere to ruin
When confronting a "Superior force " it is more important to render thier power inefective that try to match thier strength "
If a7 megaton warhead were exploded at 700-1000 miles
EVERY satelite within 1-3000 miles would be rendered usles
Further the residual radiation and electromagnetic effect would disable every satelitethat has an orbital path that goes trhough the residual explosion
The emp produced does not have to reach the surface
EVERY aspect of our live is fueled by the computers that orbit our planet
Soon after the succesful launch of the chimp ,Ahmadinajhad announced
"soon we (iran ) will have a satelite in orbit with the powers of the west "
It will bring peace to the world
Trust me If we loose our satelites from this threat , we will be a 3rd world power
Immagine : no computers( you may think your computer is hard wired but the feed is from a sattelite
The results of this round would tell us if the Nobel committee was after all correct in awarding the peace prize to you in anticipation of what was to come.
Secretary of State has a lot of work to do with his Iranian counterpart.
Yes, by all means talk to Iran, but be under no illusions about who you're dealing with. This is the same Iran that enables Assad to murder thousands of women and children and materially supports terrorism on a continuing basis.
Iran is hurting economically while also being very, very close to their objective of nuclear weapons capability. Whether they actually build a bomb or leave the process at a point where they can put one together in a few days is completely immaterial. There isn't much difference between someone carrying a loaded gun or carrying a gun in one pocket and the bullets in another.
There hasn't been any indication that they are being deflected from this objective and now are putting together an end game; a "let's all be reasonable" act where they can run out the clock while dangling some superficial concessions. No amount of happy talk mitigates the situation. Now is exactly the time to keep sanctions in place, not dilute them, and to make it clear that under no circumstances will they be permitted to have nuclear weapons capability. Negotiations, if they evolve, should be absolutely tough, and not based on wishful thinking.
People crying for war with Iran don't seem to fully appreciate war's costs; likewise, people wholly buying into Iran's charm offensive miss the fact the fact that it is still a pretty horrible, repressive regime whose track record should not earn it much trust.
Mr. President, as we found out too late in the 1930s, these are evil men and only respect the use or threat of force not a grinning charm. As you read more and more, our nation has become the snickering subject around the globe.
If that is the case, Iran and Syria should disregard anything Obama says. his actions rarely match his words.
With regard to Iran, is Rouhani's "charm offensive" more substantive than "style"?
Again.
Except for the idiocy about so-called USA exceptionalism however.
Among many positive qualities of the USA is the ability to absorb fully millions upon millions of immigrants to the benefit of both the indigenous (with the exception of native population which has been decimated) groups and the newcomers.
That is probably an exception to the experience of most countries throughout history, although the ever-remarkable Roman Empire likely did a good job of that as well. Something to be emulated elsewhere.
Municipality of Curitiba
Capital-Paranaense
Chamber of Councillors of Curitiba
State Government of Paraná-
Legislative Assembly of the State of Paraná-
Globo-
State Government of Rio de Janeiro
Municipality of Rio de Janeiro-
FEDERAL government
Brasilia-DF-
Curitiba-Band
Rede Bandeirantes -
Veja magazine -
The Globe - Rpctv Paranaense - NASA
UN - UNITED NATIONS
Roberto Marinho Foundation
Last Minute Spain)
20 Minutes (Barcelona)
20 Minutes (Madrid)